Skip to main content
It looks like you're using Internet Explorer 11 or older. This website works best with modern browsers such as the latest versions of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge. If you continue with this browser, you may see unexpected results.

Evaluating Online Sources: Evaluate Sources, incl. the news

Fact Checking Websites

Evaluate with the CRAAP Test

Critically evaluate your sources for:

     Currency

     Relevance

     Authority

     Accuracy

     Purpose

 

UPDATE: Evaluate with SIFT (The Four Moves) instead. See also: the homepage of this guide, Introducing SIFT, a Four Moves Acronym, a Short History of CRAAP, and The CRAAP Test and Whiteness, Emotion and Bias

 

Evaluating Journal Articles

Is it peer reviewed? See: peer review explained at Science Direct.

See also: the Popular vs. Scholarly page on this LibGuide.

 

Evaluating Research Articles

Evaluating Web Content

SAGE Encyclopedia of... Research Methods

How to Choose Your News

First Draft News

The Media Manipulation Casebook

The Media Manipulation Casebook

News Quality Chart

Always think about the sources of the news you are looking at.  Sources near the top are your best bet.  Bias is not in itself a problem as long as the source uses good news practices.  

undefined

Fall 2020 Featured Website

 

Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Three-part series looking into the future of the European Union’s (EU) disinformation policy.

FUTURE THREATS, FUTURE SOLUTIONS | #1
The EU’s Role in Fighting Disinformation: Taking Back the Initiative / James Pamment

FUTURE THREATS, FUTURE SOLUTIONS | #2
The EU’s Role in Fighting Disinformation: Crafting A Disinformation Framework / James Pamment

FUTURE THREATS, FUTURE SOLUTIONS #3
The EU’s Role in the Fight Against Disinformation: Developing Policy Interventions for the 2020s / James Pamment

Carnegie_Endowment-for-International_Peace-logo

 

Fall 2020 Featured Articles

Summer 2020 Washington Post The Fact Checker Channel on YouTube

Spring 2020 UN tackles 'infodemic' of misinformation

Films on Demand: How to Recognize Fake News

Evaluating "News" Sources

False, Misleading, Clickbait-y, and Satirical “News” Sources


1. F
ake, false, or regularly misleading websites are often shared on social media, including Facebook. Some of these websites may rely on “outrage” by using distorted headlines and decontextualized or dubious information in order to generate likes, shares, and profits.

2. Some websites circulate misleading and/or potentially unreliable information, or present opinion pieces as news.

3. Other websites use hyperbolic or clickbait-y headlines and/or social media descriptions, but may otherwise circulate reliable and/or verifiable information.

4. Other sources purposefully fake with the intent of satire/comedy, which can offer important critical commentary on politics and society, but have the potential to be shared as actual/literal news, for example, The Onion.

Tips for analyzing news sources:

● Avoid websites that end in “lo” ex: Newslo. These sites take pieces of accurate information and then packaging that information with other false or misleading “facts” (sometimes for the purposes of satire or comedy).

● Watch out for websites that end in “.com.co” as they are often fake versions of real news sources

● Watch out if known/reputable news sites are not also reporting on the story. Sometimes lack of coverage is the result of corporate media bias and other factors, but there should typically be more than one source reporting on a topic or event.

● Odd domain names generally equal odd and rarely truthful news.

● Lack of author attribution may, but not always, signify that the news story is suspect and requires verification.

● Some news organizations are also letting bloggers post under the banner of particular news brands; however, many of these posts do not go through the same editing process. (This includes Forbes blogs, for example.)

● Check the “About Us” tab on websites or look up the website on Snopes or Wikipedia for more information about the source.

● Bad web design and use of ALL CAPS can also be a sign that the source you’re looking at should be verified and/or read in conjunction with other sources.

● If the story makes you REALLY ANGRY it’s probably a good idea to keep reading about the topic via other sources to make sure the story you read wasn’t purposefully trying to make you angry (with potentially misleading or false information) in order to generate shares and ad revenue.

● If the website you’re reading encourages you to DOX individuals (to reveal the private information of others, i.e., cell phone number, email address, etc.), it’s unlikely to be a legitimate source of news.

● It’s always best to read multiple sources of information to get a variety of viewpoints and media frames. Some sources, such as The Daily Kos, The Huffington Post, and Fox News, vacillate between providing important, legitimate, problematic, and/or hyperbolic news coverage, requiring readers and viewers to verify and contextualize information with other sources.

 

Adapted from: 

© 2016  by Melissa Zimdars. The work 'False, Misleading, Clickbait-y, and Satirical “News” Sourcesavailable under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
 

Melissa Zimdars, Assistant Professor of Communication, Department of Communication and Media, Merrimack College, North Andover, MA

Reference Shelf: Alternative Facts, Post-Truth and the Information War

Definitions for reading, watching, listening to and writing about the news.

Terminology to add to the list, includes:
byline - a line giving the name of the writer of an article in a newspaper or magazine.

Truth, truthiness, triangulation: A news literacy toolkit for a “post-truth” world

Columbia Journalism Review | 6 Types of Misinformation

The News Literacy Project and... how to know what to believe

Calling Bullshit: In the Age of Big Data