Managing sources is a critical skill in evidence-based practice. Keeping track of what you've found, what you liked, what worked, and what didn't (and why) are all important parts of research. Thankfully, there are a number of options help you manage your stuff. See what works best for you here:
Spreadsheet- No frills, no fuss, just pure Google Sheets goodness. Write down all the key details of the sources you find, with three additional pages dedicated to what you know, what you don't, and any additional questions that pop up along the way.
Zotero- (my personal favorite) Zotero is a free open-source reference management system. Features include automatic citation generation, web-browser integration, document storage, PDF annoation, and collaborative capabilities.
Mendeley- Similar to Zotero, Mendeley is a reference management system with citation generation, storage, annotation, and collaboration. Key differences include Mendeley's social networking platform, and more streamlined interface. Mendeley offers most features for free, but you'll need to buy more storage.
Google can certainly be a convenient starting point for research, especially when exploring general topics or seeking quick answers. If you aren't sure what you are looking at, or looking for, a basic Google search may be an excellent way to get some foundational knowledge on any questions or topics you may have.
However, it may not always lead to reliable or scholarly sources suitable for evidence-based practice. Google's search results can vary widely in quality and may include non-peer-reviewed sources, biased information, or outdated content. For those engaging in evidence-based practice, it's essential to critically evaluate the credibility, relevance, and authority of any sources you may find, regardless of if it comes from Google or a database.
If you want to skip some of the work of finding credible and up-to-date information, check out our library's resources, including:
Jensenius, F., Htun, M., Samuels, D., Singer, D., Lawrence, A., & Chwe, M. (2018). The Benefits and Pitfalls of Google Scholar. PS: Political Science & Politics, 51, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1017/S104909651800094X
Rovira, C., Codina, L., & Lopezosa, C. (2021). Language Bias in the Google Scholar Ranking Algorithm. Future Internet, 13(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/fi13020031
Zientek, L., Werner, J., Campuzano, M., & Nimon, K. (2018). The Use of Google Scholar for Research and Research Dissemination. New Horizons in Adult Education and Human Resource Development, 30, 39–46. https://doi.org/10.1002/nha3.20209
Scholarly sources, such as peer-reviewed journals and academic books, are often highly credible and undergo rigorous evaluation by relevant experts in their field. These sources tend to provide in-depth analysis, detailed methodologies, and the information included within are often cited, so you can trace it back to the source.
Because of the level of detail and accountability in these sources, the information tends to be more reliable, and therefore stronger when conducting evidence-based research.
For example, a scholarly article in the Journal of Clinical Psychology might present the findings of a controlled study on the effectiveness of cognitive-behavioral therapy for anxiety disorders, providing detailed data and analysis.
However, this depth of rigor may come at the price of accessbility.
On the other hand, popular sources like magazines, newspapers, and websites offer accessible and engaging content but may lack the depth and reliability of scholarly sources. They can be useful for gaining initial insights into a topic or understanding broader trends and perspectives.
For instance, an article in Psychology Today might offer practical tips for managing anxiety, drawing on personal experiences and general observations.
While popular sources can provide useful background information, they should be used cautiously in certain types of academic research, as they may not always be rigorously vetted or based on empirical evidence.
When you're looking for information, using various search strategies can help you find what you need, and find it quickly!
Before you start using advanced search strategies, it is important to break your topic or question into some key words. Question frameworks, like PICO and SPIDER, can help you break down your question into key words. Or, you can bring your potential topic(s) to a librarian, and they will be happy to help. For most, if not all, of your key words, it is important to make note of some of their synonyms.
Subject Headings are key terms that act like a tag or label describing what the item (article, book, thesis, etc.) is about. Like social meadia hastags, suject headings useful because they provide a consistent way of describing the subject matter of the item. These headings can be created by either the author or the database, and use a standarized list to create a controlled vocabulary.
MeSH stands for Medical Suject Headings, and are the controlled vocaulary or thesaurus produced by the National Library of MEdicine MeSH terms are hierarchically-organized vocabulary produced by the National Library of Medicine. It is used for indexing, cataloging, and searching of biomedical and health-related information. MeSH terms include the subject headings that appear in PubMed and other NLM databases.
Want to get the most out of your search terms without having to add a new key word for each variation of a term? Then look no further than truncation, wildcards, and phrasing!
Truncation and wildcards can be applied to a keyword search in a database or search engine to broaden your results and allow you to look for variations of words.
The truncation symbol can be used in a keyword search to retrieve alternate word endings
Use with caution to ensure relevant words are being retrieved; in some cases, you should avoid truncating a keyword too far to the left
Wildcards are symbols that can optionally replace one or more letters in a word
Wildcards are useful when dealing with variant spelling
Note: Some databases differentiate between wildcards that represent
Truncation and wildcard symbols can vary among databases:
A search for anders#n returns items whose record contains: anderson, andersen
A search for bu?2ler returns items whose record contains: burner, butler
Check the help screen of other databases to find out which symbols are used!
If you want to find an exact phrase, you can put it in quotation marks (e.g., "Climate change" rather than "Climate" AND "Change")
Note: Some databases use parathesis instead.
When exploring resources within the library or specific databases, you're pretty likely to encounter search results that don't really align with your needs. These results might be outdated, lack peer-review status, or not accessible in full text (but you need to read it right now!).
Thats why it's important to filter your results! But remember while its important to narrow down your results, don't go too extreme with your filters (or you might miss out on some results that you actually need), and make sure to explore all the filtering options available!
Check out some of the filtering options in EBSCO (an excellent database to start with!) in this video.
Boolean operators are the words "AND", "OR" and "NOT". When used in library databases (typed between your keywords) they can make each search more precise - and save you time!
AND narrows a search by telling the database that ALL keywords used must be found in an article in order for it to appear in your results list. Search for two or more concepts that interest you by combining descriptive keywords with AND.
OR broadens a search by telling the database that any of the words it connects are allowed. This is particularly helpful when you are searching for synonyms, such as “climate change” OR “global warming.”
(pic here)
NOT narrows your search by telling the database to eliminate all terms that follow it from your search results. This can be useful when you are interested in a very specific aspect of a topic, such as "higher education" NOT "online instruction" won't pull results for online classes.
Note: Use NOT with caution as good items can be eliminated from the results retrieved.
Search Google Scholar from the Cressman Library Databases A-Z list or from a Cressman Library Research Guide so that your results will include Find It@Cedar Crest and Full Text @ Cedar Crest links when the library has full text access to an article. If you do not use the library's Google Scholar link, then select Cedar Crest College in the Google Scholar Settings for “Library links.”
Multidisciplinary collection of resources. Life, health and physical sciences, social science, and the humanities. Provides access to several Business, History, and a number of Sociology reference works from Blackwell Reference Online and access to over 1,800 Wiley journals.
Institute of Education Sciences- The Institute of Education Sciences (IES) is the research arm of the U.S. Department of Education. Their work encompasses six areas, including collecting and analyzing education data, funding research for improvement strategies, evaluating federal programs, promoting data-driven decision-making, and advancing statistical methods and research practices through training and development initiatives.
Best Evidence Encyclopedia- The Best Evidence Encyclopedia (BEE) is a free website by Johns Hopkins University's Center for Research and Reform in Education (CRRE). It offers educators and researchers reliable information on the effectiveness of K-12 programs. BEE features systematic meta-analyses on topics like reading, math, and science, along with articles on review methods and special education policy.
The Campbell Collaboration- The Campbell Collaboration is an international research network that produces systematic reviews and evidence synthesis to inform evidence-based policies and practices across various social and economic domains with focuses on social, behavioral, and educational interventions.
AOTA Practice Guidelines The AOTA Practice Guidelines are evidence-based recommendations developed by the American Occupational Therapy Association (AOTA) to guide occupational therapy practitioners in delivering effective and high-quality care.
Rehabilitation Reference Center Rehabilitation Reference Center is a point-of-care resource for therapists and sports medicine professionals, offering the latest evidence-based information in their specialties. It includes 11,800 exercise images, 790 clinical reviews, 90 research instruments, and 3,000 patient education handouts in English and Spanish
PEDro The Physiotherapy Evidence Database is a free database of evidence-based research in physiotherapy. It provides access to systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials, and other relevant research to support evidence-informed decision-making among physiotherapists and other healthcare professionals.
Cochrane Reviews The Cochrane Institute offers various types of articles including methods research, scoping reviews, rapid reviews, and evidence gap maps.
Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine The Center for Evidence-Based Medicine (CEBM) is an academic institution associated with the University of Oxford.
UpToDate- UpToDate is an evidence-based clinical decision support system authored by physicians to help clinicians make the right decisions at the point of care.